Prediction of Jessica Pegula [3rd] vs Tamara Zidansek [163rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W W
Form
W W L W L W W L W LHead-2-Head: Pegula 2 - 0 Zidansek
They have played 4 sets in total, with Pegula winning 4 and Zidansek winning 0. The last match between Pegula and Zidansek was at the French Open - Paris, 28-05-2022, Third, Clay with Jessica Pegula getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 2 |
| Tamara Zidansek | 0 |
| Pegula | Stats | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| 81% (25-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (10-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 3 | Ranking | 163 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 21 |
| 65% (458-251) | Career Total W/L | 64% (359-204) |
| $12,654,766 | Career Prize Money | $1,990,811 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Jessica Pegula
Player
Tamara Zidansek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Tamara Zidansek
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:14:27 | Average Match Time | 1:14:27 |
| 58% (57/99) | 1st Serve % | 61% (81/132) |
| 75% (43/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (47/81) |
| 64% (27/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (17/51) |
| 64% (9/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (68/132) | Return Points Win % | 29% (29/99) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jessica Pegula vs Tamara Zidansek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pegula 2 - 0 Zidansek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pegula has won 43.71% of points on their second serve, while Zidansek has won 40.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pegula, in recent form, has won 47.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zidansek has won 52.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.04% and 35.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pegula has saved 50.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zidansek has saved 38.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pegula has won 75.76% of matches played (W/L 50/ 16), with Zidansek winning 53.85% (W/L 28/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pegula has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 271/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23). Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 242/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Pegula has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Pegula winning 2 times and Zidansek being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Pegula winning 4 and Zidansek winning 0. The last match between Pegula and Zidansek was at the French Open - Paris, 28-05-2022, Third, Clay with Jessica Pegula getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pegula and Zidansek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pegula winning 0 times and Zidansek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pegula winning 1, and Zidansek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pegula has played against opponents with an average rank of 120.36 while Zidansek has played against players with an average rank of 202.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pegula has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zidansek has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pegula has converted 36.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zidansek has converted 39.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jessica Pegula Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Sofia Kenin
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
107)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Danielle Rose Collins
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jessica Pegula
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Alexandra Eala
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
102)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Emma Raducanu
78%
(
80 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Marta Kostyuk
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(3) 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Dalma Galfi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Darja Semenistaja
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Tamara Zidansek
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Irina Maria Bara
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
79%
(
48 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Pegula vs Zidansek?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Pegula Vs Zidansek is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (458/251) | Win/Loss | 64% (359/204) |
| 62% (1007/622) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (794/513) |
| 55% (8239/6853) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6524/5522) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1321 | Aces Total | 498 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1485 | Total Double Faults | 1532 |
| 1:11:13 | Average Match Time | 1:26:46 |
| 129.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 190.32 |
| 59% (22663/38353) | 1st Serve % | 66% (22933/34732) |
| 65% (14672/22663) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (13747/22933) |
| 49% (7621/15689) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5394/11803) |
| 47% (2291/4857) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2262/4640) |
| 46% (17522/38225) | Return Points Win % | 47% (16346/34455) |
| 64% (450/700) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (355/552) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 58% (100/171) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (75/118) |
| 55% (120/219) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (109/186) |
| 87% (454/395) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (325/288) |
| 13% (454/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (325/35) |
| 24% (254/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (238/71) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
